Tuesday, September 24, 2013

No way to keep US weapons out of enemy hands in Syria

Fast & Furious, Part II: No way to keep US weapons out of enemy hands in Syria

Washington Times - ‎6 hours ago‎
Some of the U.S. weapons flowing to rebels in Syria are bound to fall into the hands of Islamic extremists, say analysts and a retired Army general just back from touring the country.
Commanders told Gen. Vallely that they think the CIA-delivered arms will fall into the hands of the “wrong elements” before any reach secular Free Syrian Army brigades in and around Aleppo, Syria’s largest city and economic center.
Brotherhood ‘pawns’
Frederic Hof, who was a special adviser on Syria to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, supports Gen. Idriss as the best way to get arms to the right people. He said food and medical aid have been delivered through the general’s staff. The U.S. has tracked the shipments and believes the supplies ended up in the right places.
Still, Mr. Hof, now an analyst at the Atlantic Council, concedes: “There is no 100 percent guarantee that every single thing is going to get to its intended source. I don’t think even UPS can do that. These extremists are already armed to the teeth. I don’t want to sound blase about it. It is a big issue. We’ll shoot for 100 percent, but our chances of getting it in a situation like this are not too good.”
James Russell, a former Pentagon official who focused on foreign arms sales, said history shows that when U.S. officials introduce weapons into a foreign war, those arms come back to bite them.
“I don’t know how we could possibly categorically state that the arms we provide will only remain with the groups we are supporting,” said Mr. Russell, an instructor at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, Calif. “War is chaotic and confusing. We are not there to provide oversight.
“There’s a long history to this, of course. American arms provided with the best of intentions to our erstwhile allies in Afghanistan, Vietnam and Iraq found their way into the hands of our enemies. I don’t expect Syria will be any different.”
Gen. Vallely founded the nonprofit group StandUpAmericaUS.org. One of its top projects is to persuade the Obama administration to order airstrikes to bring down the Assad regime, which launched a poison gas attack Aug. 21 that killed more than 1,400 in a neighborhood near Damascus. He has submitted a target list to the Pentagon.
He said Free Syrian Army commanders told him that some factions under the Supreme Military Council are “pawns” of the Muslim Brotherhood. The murky Islamist network has made a top priority of capitalizing on the chaos in Syria, especially since military leaders in Egypt are trying to destroy the movement there through attacks and arrests.
The oil-rich emirate of Qatar, which funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to keep the Muslim Brotherhood in power in Egypt, has sent huge cash payments to various rebel groups in Syria, Gen. Vallely said. Where one finds Qatari money, there is also the Muslim Brotherhood, he said.
“The Muslim Brotherhood is a grand mafia,” he said. “They’re the smart guys. They’re planning everything. They’re getting the money.”
Hodgepodge of factions
Gen. Vallely said the best policy for getting arms to the right units is to assign the task not to Gen. Idriss but to another Syrian defector, air force Col. Riad al-Asaad. Gen. Vallely met Col. al-Asaad in Turkey, where the rebel leader is recovering from war wounds.
Obama administration representatives would not publicly discuss the arms shipments’ destination.
The administration previously designated the Supreme Military Council to receive nonlethal aid in the form of food and medical supplies. Former officials say the council also is handling the U.S. lethal aid, which consists of small arms and ammunition. President Obama, under pressure from hawks in Congress, reversed course in June and decided to arm anti-Assad forces.
The Combating Terrorism Center at West Point has studied the Free Syrian Army, and its latest analysis is not reassuring. Rather than anything resembling a cohesive armed force, the Free Syrian Army is a hodgepodge of fronts, militias and factions.
“The FSA has always been more of a brand name than an actual organization,” the report says.
Of the year-old Supreme Military Council and Gen. Idriss, it says: “There is no evidence that it functions as a conventional military organization or that Idriss enjoys real control over member factions. To the contrary, member groups retain their separate identities and operational autonomy and proclaim loyalty to their own commanders.”
The council’s single largest coalition is the Syria Islamic Liberation Front, which comprises more than 20 rebel groups. They include the Islamist Tawhid Brigade, which claims about 30 subfactions, the West Point study says.
Another Supreme Military Council-sponsored fighting unit is the Durou al-Thawra Commission, which was set up in part by the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood.
Mr. Hof, who held the rank of ambassador in the Obama administration, endorses the policy of making Gen. Idriss the dispenser of arms.
“Unless we get into this business in earnest, we’re going to see things gravitate more and more toward radicals who have received a good deal of money from private sources from the Gulf, and who because they have the money and have the arms are able to attract young Syrians who want to be in the fight who don’t necessarily have anything to do or any attractions toward an al Qaeda-type philosophy,” Mr. Hof said.
He added: “The people with the resources have a certain magnetic quality in a situation likes this. This is why we have to make sure Idriss has the resources. If people inside the country see him as the exclusive source of everything coming in from the outside, I guarantee you we will begin to see a Free Syrian Army that actually has a chain of command, command and control, and all the other attributes of a normal military force.”
Gen. Vallely said Col. al-Asaad and other Free Syrian Army commanders have one main request for the U.S. — launch airstrikes against the attack helicopters and jets that keep the Assad regime in power.
“With that and logistical support, they will bring Assad down in 30 days,” he said.
 Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

end quote from:

 
 

New strike in Greece over civil service cuts

New strike in Greece over civil service cuts

Aljazeera.com - ‎15 hours ago‎
Greek public sector workers have gone on strike for the second time in a week, shutting down schools and leaving hospitals with few staff, as inspectors from Greece's foreign lenders checked if the country was meeting its bailout targets. Workers ...
Greece Moves Back to Center Stage in Europe's Debt Drama
New protests, strike in Greece over civil service cuts

Ted Cruz fights health law, but most in GOP refuse to join

Ted Cruz fights health law, but most in GOP refuse to join

Chicago Tribune - ‎12 minutes ago‎
WASHINGTON—. U.S. Senator Ted Cruz, a Tea Party favorite, took his fight to defund President Barack Obama's healthcare overhaul to the Senate floor on Tuesday, but most of his Republican colleagues refused to join him.
Ted Cruz Embraces 'Wacko Bird' Label
House GOP may attach Obamacare delay to CR
Ted Cruz: The Distinguished Wacko Bird from Texas
The Cruz Campaign Against ObamaCare
Cruz Vows to Speak Till He Can't Against Obamacare

Ted Cruz fights health law, but most in GOP refuse to join



  • Email





Efforts by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) to defund the Affordable Care Act have caused a split among Senate Republicans.
U.S. Senator Ted Cruz, a Tea Party favorite, took his fight to defund President Barack Obama's healthcare overhaul to the Senate floor on Tuesday, but most of his Republican colleagues refused to join him.

In fact, a majority of the 46 Republicans in the Senate may end up lining up instead with their party leaders, who want to pass an emergency spending bill by September 30 that would avoid a federal government shutdown and would undercut Cruz's high-stakes effort to stop Obamacare.

Standing in a nearly empty Senate, Cruz began an attention-grabbing speech in the early afternoon Tuesday that could stretch into Wednesday in favor of withholding funds to operate the government unless Obamacare is gutted.

"I intend to speak in support of defunding Obamacare until I am no longer able to stand," said the freshman Texas senator who has his eye on a 2016 run for president.

He went on to talk about his father "flippin pancakes," making "green eggs and ham," "the travesty of Obamacare," and, proudly, about his unpopularity among many fellow Republicans.

Practically every day, he said in his marathon speech, "I now pick up the newspaper to learn what a scoundrel I am."

It had the look and sound of an old-fashioned "filibuster" used traditionally by senators to block legislation, except that in this case, it won't.

Under Senate rules, Cruz must yield the floor for a procedural vote on Wednesday when Democrats and many Republicans are expected to band together to begin moving the must-do spending bill toward passage, likely on Sunday.

It will then go back to the House, which will have one day to pass the bill or find a compromise with the Senate. Unless new funding is quickly approved, a government shutdown would begin on Tuesday.

Republicans uniformly want to repeal Obamacare. But many see that as a political impossibility in the face of Democratic opposition and do not want to trigger a government shutdown in a battle that even Cruz has acknowledged is futile.

For the most part, Democrats sat back enjoying the display of a Republican in a dog fight with other Republicans.

Cruz has a following however. Club for Growth, a conservative group influential among Republicans, put senators on notice that it expected them to support Cruz's bid and block Democrats' from eliminating the provision to defund Obamacare.

But his fellow Republicans were moving in the other direction one day after the party's top two leaders in the Senate, Mitch McConnell and John Cornyn, refused to lend their support to Cruz.

Senator Orrin Hatch, the senior Republican on the Senate Finance Committee that oversees Obamacare, announced he would side with McConnell rather than Cruz.

Senator Lindsey Graham said he expects a majority of the Senate's 46 Republicans will reject Cruz's high-stakes maneuver that has been embraced by the Republican-led House of Representatives.

"I think most Republicans believe, no matter how sincere you are about defunding Obamacare, that this approach would blow up in our face," Graham told Reuters in a brief hallway interview on Capitol Hill.

A government shutdown could ruin the party's chances of winning back control of the Senate in the 2014 elections.

At the urging of Cruz and other legislators aligned with the anti-government Tea Party movement, the Republican-led House of Representatives passed the bill providing government funding but without money for Obamacare. Passage came on a party-line vote on Friday.

Since Cruz launched his bid, Republican senators and their aides have been unusually candid in their impatience with him, laying bare a deep split within the Republican Party.

"We will end up not shutting the government down and we will not defund Obamacare. That's how the movie ends," Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona told reporters.

As the Senate slowly moved through a debate that likely will lead to passing a government funding bill by Sunday, House Republicans continued to weigh their options once they receive the Senate's work.

Some congressional aides have said that a new round of House amendments were being weighed, possibly including one to repeal an unpopular medical device tax aimed at generating $30 billion in revenues over a decade to help pay for Obamacare subsidies.

SENATE PASSAGE POSSIBLE SUNDAY

The Senate is expected to pass a new bill by Sunday. It would then be returned to the House for concurrence. The chamber could then approve the Senate version or try to amend it - but would only have a day or so before current government funding expires.

At this point, it is unclear what the House Republican leadership would decide to do, generating plenty of questions and anxiety.

House Republican leaders have not informed rank-and-file members what the final stage of the fight over the spending bill will look like, according to an aide to one junior Republican.

"First and foremost, he doesn't want the government to shut down," the aide said, though adding that the lawmaker was under intense pressure from conservatives back home to stop Obamacare.

"He is definitely stressed," the aide said.

Once the battle over government funding bill is resolved, Congress will grapple with another fiscal crisis - a possible and unprecedented U.S. government default unless it agrees to raise the $16.7 trillion U.S. borrowing authority by sometime next month or early November.

Republicans are expected to place demands on any bill to increase the debt limit, including one to delay for a year implementation of Obamacare, now set to begin to kick in next month.

end quote from:

Ted Cruz fights health law, but most in GOP refuse to join

Al Qaeda's African Surge Threatens the US

Wall Street Journal ‎- 27 minutes ago
Katherine Zimmerman writes in the Wall Street Journal that the affiliate that attacked the shopping mall in Kenya includes young Muslim recruits ...

Al Qaeda's African Surge Threatens the U.S.

The affiliate that attacked the shopping mall in Kenya includes young Muslim recruits from Minnesota.

    By
  • KATHERINE ZIMMERMAN
On Tuesday, after a four-day siege by terrorists who murdered at least 67 people, the Westgate shopping mall in Nairobi, Kenya, still appeared not to have been secured by government forces. The attack by more than a dozen heavily armed members of the Somalia-based al Shabaabterrorist group—including reportedly several Americans—was a thoroughly planned operation. Teams of the al Qaeda-affiliated terrorists entered the mall's first and second floors in a two-pronged attack. The terrorists lined up hostages, separated Muslims from Christians and others, then tested the self-proclaimed Muslims on their knowledge of Arabic and Islam. Those who failed were shot, children included. The militants then settled in with the surviving hostages to repulse attempts to extract them.
Who are these terrorists? Al Shabaab—in Arabic, "the youth"—traces its roots to the militant wing of the Islamic Courts Union, an Islamist political movement that rose to power in Somalia in 2006. A U.S.-backed Ethiopian invasion of Somalia in December 2006 toppled the ICU, whose leaders fled. But al Shabaab remained and rapidly consolidated power as the dominant insurgent force. When less capable African Union peacekeepers replaced Ethiopian troops, al Shabaab recaptured much of southern and central Somalia by 2009.
Agence France-Presse/Getty Images
Kenyan troops take positions inside Nairobi's Westgate Mall on Sept. 21, 2013.
There they might have remained if not for a United States- and United Nations-backed effort to beef up the African Union force. A far more robust and battle-tested Amisom (the African Union Mission in Somalia) pushed back al Shabaab, and by September 2012 the group had lost the strategic town of Kismayo, and with it much of al Shabaab's revenue and reputation.
What followed is essential to understanding the resiliency of local Islamist extremist groups and the evolution of al Qaeda. As al Shabaab began losing ground in Somalia, a leadership battle ensued between those who wanted to be part of a global Islamist movement and others with more parochial aims. In 2012, al Shabaab declared itself part of al Qaeda, eliminating dissenters through assassination.
Al Shabaab's decision to relegate the fight for Somali territory to secondary status was a major change. A group that had espoused more limited aims was suddenly abandoning its desire for local power in favor of a more idealized global fight. It is this model that is propelling al Qaeda, allowing the Islamist network to spread in Syria, Sinai, Iraq, Libya and Yemen.
Groups like al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, Ansar al Shariah in Libya, Ansar Beit al Maqdis in the Sinai, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, and al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb have metastasized from local to networked global al Qaeda groups. Al Shabaab is following al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, which first hit Saudi targets and then moved on to the United States.
Yet the U.S. government insists on calling al Shabaab a local, Somali threat, playing down the potential threat to the U.S. The Obama administration has clung instead to the narrative that al Qaeda is on the "path to defeat" and its remnants are "lethal, but less capable," as President Obama put it in May.
A major tip-off in al Shabaab's transformation was its effort to recruit Americans. According to U.S. officials, 50 or so U.S. citizens have made their way to Somalia since 2007 to join al Shabaab. This includes members of the Somali diaspora and non-Somalis, such as Syrian-American Omar Hammami, who called himself Abu Mansur al Amriki, aka "the American," before he was killed earlier this month in Somalia, the victim of an internal dispute.
American Somalis began joining al Shabaab to fight the Ethiopians in 2007. Insight into its recruitment has come from the courtroom testimony of individuals who were arrested for providing material support to al Shabaab upon returning from Somalia: A local recruiter would promise vulnerable Muslim youths in the U.S. entry to paradise if they fought the Christian invaders. The youths would slip away for the trip to Somalia, often without the knowledge of their families.
The recruits receive military training in al Shabaab territory with other members of the Somali diaspora. A handful of Americans have worked their way up the ranks in al Shabaab, but many more were excluded from fighting the Ethiopians. Their lack of direct clan ties—to family members who could hold al Shabaab responsible for their deaths—made the Americans ideal candidates to become suicide bombers.
The first known Somali-American bomber, Shirwa Ahmed, participated in a suicide attack in northern Somalia in October 2008. Others followed, including Farah Mohamed Beledi and Abdisalan Hussain Ali, both from Minneapolis, who blew themselves up in separate attacks in 2011. Some young fighters became disillusioned upon seeing their compatriots siphoned off for cannon fodder. But there is no escape from al Shabaab, and many who attempted to leave have been executed.
A handful of Americans attempting to join al Shabaab have been stopped by law-enforcement while planning to travel to Somalia. Others, like Kamal Said Hassan and Abdifatah Yusuf Isse of the Minneapolis area, returned to the U.S. after training with al Shabaab. Convicted of providing material support to a terrorist group, Hassan was sentenced to 10 years in prison and Isse received a three-year sentence earlier this year.
U.S. intelligence officials fear that the score or so of American passport holders believed to be members of al Shabaab might return to the U.S. to commit terrorism. Al Shabaab's leadership has not espoused attacks on America, but security experts fear that recruitment targeting Americans increases the probability of an attack.
Last month, al Shabaab released a video featuring what it called its "Minnesota Martyrs." Minnesota is home to the largest U.S. population of Somalis. The 40-minute video, the first in a promised series, featured three Americans. The video glorified the three young men, saying they had given their lives on what is now a global battlefield. Although some within the group may see Africa as their battleground, those who have cemented the relationship with al Qaeda understand that jihad stretches from Morocco to the Philippines, from Tanzania to Iraq. And as al Qaeda leader Ayman Zawahiri has made clear, to the United States.
If reports now surfacing regarding Americans involved in the Nairobi attack—al Shabaab's response to the Kenyan military presence in Somalia—are confirmed, it will be difficult for the Obama administration to continue claiming that al Shabaab is purely local. The terror group has the means for a major attack, and al Qaeda's focus on the U.S. provides the motive.
From the triumphalism after Osama bin Laden's death to the president's most recent speeches trumpeting an end to the war on terror, the Obama administration continues to proclaim al Qaeda's demise. Implicit in this claim is that the Obama counterterrorism strategy is succeeding and "the tide of war is receding," which in turn underpin substantial cuts to security spending and retreat from foreign entanglements. Alas, reciting a mantra does not make it true. Far from defeated, al Qaeda is stronger now than ever.
Ms. Zimmerman is a senior analyst at the American Enterprise Institute's Critical Threats Project.
end quote:
 
I have a slightly different take on all this. Viewed from my perspective there has never been a time that I can remember that Muslim Terrorists were not threatening the U.S. And my memory goes back to about 1950. They started to get worse around the mid 1960s and have gotten progressively worse since then. Terrorists by their very nature whether it was Irish Nationalists or Israeli terrorists creating Israel in the 1940s or Palestine terrorists trying to turn Israel back into Palestine by Arafat or Al Qaeda first being the Mujahadeen of Afghanistan and then morphing into Al Qaeda and other Middle Eastern elements ever since all use basically the same methods to get attention for their causes. So, terrorism is an ongoing thing. We likely won't have to deal with World Wars for now unless there is another Hitler or Stalin or someone like that or Mao or someone else that is going to use extreme and violent methods like that. But, we are going to have to deal with terrorists likely the rest of our lives, our children's lives and their children's lives just because of the very nature of life on earth as it is now. It has been this way for as long as I can remember already and I'm 65 presently.
 
 

The Winds and the Rain and Snow

The scariest things I foresee for mankind to deal with likely are the winds and the droughts. Strangely enough, the rain and the snows are difficult but are also often a paradox as well. For example, the rains that hit Colorado recently cut off whole towns of people and all the people needed to be evacuated some for 6 months or more until roads are rebuilt into those areas. But the paradox here is that this same water was caught by by dams and lakes will keep the people alive in those areas for the next year too.

So, actually it is the high winds and the long term droughts that are more serious for all life forms throughout the world. Some people are going to survive rains and floods and severe snowstorms which also bring much needed water. However, winds above 100 mph and droughts lasting a year or more are going to cause people and cattle and farm animals and farmers to go bankrupt and to possibly move to another complete area to resettle which might devastate some areas on earth by everyone moving away and leaving some areas of earth basically abandoned.

Then the winds. When you have winds above 100 mph any time of year trees are going to come down. sometimes bushes and houses or parts of houses are going to blow away etc. So, high winds once a year or many times a year will inevitably change life in all areas of the world where this happens.

And as winds and droughts increase together in some areas this means blowing dirt and sand at 100 mph  or more which is very difficult to walk through without covering your mouths with cloth or masks and is very difficult even to stand up in let alone to walk in.

What can you do to survive the uncertain future of life on Earth?

I think getting straight with yourself is very important. Some people will be healed by visiting or in some cases even moving to the wilderness somewhere on earth where they feel safe, and healed by the weather and climate and place.

By developing your gifts in such a place or in visiting such a place for a time you will renew yourselves for what comes in the future. The more tuned in you are to the movements of nature in weather and storms and earth changes in earthquakes and volcanoes, the more likely you and all you love will have a chance to survive too. It has always been this way for thousands and thousands of years.

How do you think people and tribes of people survived all this sort of thing before weather satellites for thousands and thousands of years already?

When Friends Die

My wife told me today she finally was able to speak with her 95 year old stepfather. His biological kids had sort of been protecting him since his 14 year girlfriend (about 80 years old) had passed away. They were very afraid for him and protective of him even though he has not lost any mental factulties even at 95 though he walks with a cane and has a pacemaker.  So, today she finally could talk to him to see if he was all right. We had encouraged him to date when my wife's mother passed away in 1999. Especially because he didn't believe in God so this made it even more important for him to date other ladies in order for him to want to stay alive. So, this is a terrible loss for him at age 95. But he has a brother still going strong at age 99 so maybe he can weather this too.

We likely will attend her funeral in the next week sometime in southern California, but I could hear the serious relief in my wife's voice that she finally was allowed to talk to him and to know his mental faculties at least were still intact.

I think there are at the very least somewhere between 40,000 and 80,000 people over 100 now in the U.S. and this will double between now and 2020 at least. If I'm lucky I will be one of them too around 2050